The Role of Local Government Administration in Rural Development in Nigeria: Evidence from Bichi Local Government Area, Kano State
Published 2026-09-14
Keywords
- local government administration; rural development; decentralisation; grassroots governance; citizen participation; Kano State; Nigeria.
Copyright (c) 2026 Scholarly Journal of Social Sciences Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract
Local government administration is intended to provide a proximate institutional mechanism for translating public policy into grassroots development, particularly in rural communities where access to infrastructure, social services, and economic opportunities remains constrained. This study examines the role of local government administration in rural development in Bichi Local Government Area (LGA) of Kano State, Nigeria, with particular attention to infrastructure development, social services, agricultural support, community empowerment, and citizen participation during the period 2019–2023. The study adopted a descriptive survey design within a mixed-methods framework. Data were obtained from 100 respondents comprising local government officials, community leaders, and rural residents, supplemented by semi-structured key-informant interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, and Likert-scale summaries, while qualitative evidence was used to provide contextual interpretation of the survey findings. The results reveal substantial gaps in public awareness and engagement with local government administration: only 13% of respondents reported awareness of local government responsibilities, while 84% reported that they had never benefited directly from a local government project. Infrastructure development received the most favourable assessment, with 50% of respondents expressing agreement that the local government contributes to infrastructural improvement. In contrast, agricultural support attracted the weakest assessment, with 44% expressing disagreement. Corruption was identified as a major constraint, with 62% agreeing that it affects local government project performance, while 67% were uncertain about the existence of a functional monitoring and evaluation system. Similarly, 77% either disagreed that the local government possessed sufficient resources for development or were uncertain about its resource adequacy. The study concludes that local government administration in Bichi LGA has made uneven contributions to rural development and that institutional, financial, accountability, and participatory weaknesses constrain its developmental effectiveness. It recommends strengthening public civic education, fiscal and project transparency, participatory planning, agricultural support, administrative capacity, and functional monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to improve grassroots development outcomes.